Skip to content

Thank you to all!!

When this blog was first created the main objective was to ensure the content on all the consumer sites about Aftermath, Inc. would not be lost. As we discovered most of the horror stories about this company sudenly started disappearing. We took immediate action to save as much of the info on as many sites as we could before Aftermath, Inc. took them down for P.R. purposes.

We wished, but would have never thought this site would have had so much public attention, and that is has given some of the families hope something would be done by this viscous company.

I as many of you wish the worst for the people in this company that are making the irrational decisions to do what they do. I am a firm believer in Karma, and do not wish any ill-will on any of my fellow humans on this earth, but do believe the ones in Aftermath, Inc. who have ruined peoples lives will pay in some way throughout their lives. They know who they are and should be ashamed of themselves.

Happy thoughts…They will pay!!

We wish everyone a Happy Holiday!!

Aftermath inc. is Aftermath Services, llc.

Aftermath Inc. is now using the alias Aftermath Services, llc. please keep your eyes open for they are defiantly trying to cover their tracks. It is a little odd if they are doing nothing wrong, why in the world would you hide your name?

***WARNING***** Aftermath Inc. now using alias Aftermath Services LLC.

BEWARE! Aftermath Inc. has realized that slowly but surely all of our readers are bringing awareness to their fraudulent practices.

They are now advertising as Aftermath Services LLC. but have the same shady business practices. We continue to bring awareness to individuals to stay away from this cleanup company. We are also trying to bring awareness to every local and state police department who continues to refer (you know who you are, and SHAME on you! ) this despicable company. Feel free to share this web site with your local police department!

 

 

WOW..Insider information

This was a comment from one of our readers. Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse!

 

I would like to start off by saying aftermath inc is one of if not the most scrupulous, deceitful, unethical companies in the United States. Their practices should be considered illegal and the government should step in to shut them down. Aftermath has ruined the lives of hundreds if not thousands of families left to deal with the death of a loved one. Aftermath has no compassion or sympathy for their customers the grieving family. Aftermath continually takes advantage when people are in their most vulnerable state. If you don’t believe me just look up their customer complaints on the web. There are endless stories of how aftermath over charged, put liens on property, lied to land jobs, committed insurance fraud the list goes on. Charges include supplies that are marked up 300% and a profit charge of 20%. In reality most of aftermaths invoices fall between $45,000-$70,000. I’ve personally seen jobs reach over the $100,000 mark. They continually perform work without the insurance companies approval but lie to the customer by stating the insurance claim has already been set. Aftermath won’t even contact the insurance company until the job is completed. Aftermath will then strong arm the insurance adjuster to pay the outrageous bill. If insurance doesn’t pay the bill then it falls back on the signer of the contract. Let’s get back to how aftermath charges. They show up at a job scene and inspect the situation. They will then ask the customer if he or she has homeowners insurance. If insurance is available then all gloves are off. Aftermath charges for every penny they can get. $285 an hour for one supervisor, $275 an hour for two techs each, $400 for each bio-box, $500 dispatch fee, $400 truck disinfection fee, 20-40% profit and overhead charge and there are more i can’t remember at this moment but there ARE several more. Their supply charges are ridiculous on their own. $12 for a pair of gloves,  $75 for each suit, chemicals ranging from $40-$60 an ounce, a hepa purifier cost $300-400 a day to run. They even have the nerve to charge an hourly vacuum usage charge. They also charge you to clean the tools used. What company does that? If a plumber came to your home to fix a broken toilet and then tried to charge you to clean the tools he used. What would you say. I sure would not  pay for him to clean HIS tools. Shouldn’t that fall under the company’s own overhead? So aftermath charges to clean the tools and truck by the hour even though you’re charged an overhead right off the bat. If that’s not greed. I worked in their office and in the field so I know first hand how business is run at aftermath. I constantly caught grief on jobs that weren’t collected even though the customers had 30 days. We were yelled at by the bosses because we only did $3 million one month and they expected $4 million. THAT’S ONE MONTH PROFIT!  The owners claim they care about the families and follow all osha guidelines. It a bunch of bologna. They are in it for one thing and that’s to get as much money out of people as they can. Aftermath is currently under investigation in Texas, Iowa, Ohio, Massachusetts and a few other states for unethical business practice. If you didn’t already know about their little appearance on inside edition. Look here http://m.insideedition.com/?redirurl=/investigative/6376-crime-scene-clean-up-inside-edition-investigates
I am putting this information out as a warning. Aftermath is an evil corporation that needs to be shut down. They should have to pay back the tens of millions of dollars they overcharged and scammed to obtain. Please check with your insurance company before you sign any contracts. I guarantee your agent will tell you a few horror stories about Aftermath’s greedy way.  More to come…

Reader’s Watchdog: Iowa consumer chief says state will examine Aftermath practices

Here is where the original content was acquired from.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130418/NEWS/304180110/Reader-s-Watchdog-Iowa-consumer-chief-says-state-will-examine-Aftermath-practices

 

State officials are warning first-responders not to refer Iowans to specific companies specializing in crime scene and suicide clean-up following a Des Moines Register Reader’s Watchdog report.

The report published Sunday questioned why police, sheriff’s deputies and medical examiners were referring families to Illinois-based Aftermath Inc. — and has prompted an investigation by Iowa’s Attorney General into the company’s contracts with Iowa families.

The company has been the subject of consumer complaints in Iowa and at least 11 other states because of staggering charges and questionable business practices.

Bill Brauch, the head of the Consumer Protection Division within the Attorney General’s office, urged Iowans to contact his office if they or their insurers have disputed past charges from the company.

“We are definitely looking into this,” he said.

Aftermath spokesperson Laura McGowan told the Register the company will work with any attorney general who wants to investigate the company’s business practices.

More representatives from sheriffs groups, county medical examiners and police acknowledged to The Des Moines Register this week they have referred Iowa families to Aftermath Services, largely because of its extensive direct marketing to the agencies and in law-enforcement seminars.

Sunday’s column featured a complaint from Cynthia Holtgrewe of Bellevue, Neb., following her grandson’s suicide in Fort Dodge. She said Aftermath tried to charge $44,000 for a day’s work until family members ejected workers from the home and an insurance agent intervened, she said.

Dr. Dan Cole, an officer of the Iowa Association of County Medical Examiners, said officials with the State Medical Examiner’s Office warned him last week — after a Reader’s Watchdog inquiry — that medical examiners should not refer customers to specific biohazard companies.

Cole said that until he read the column in the Register, he had no idea how much Aftermath Inc. charged the Fort Dodge family after he referred them to the company.

A past president and the current treasurer of the medical examiners’ association, Cole said he plans to take action in May to try to assure Aftermath is no longer a vendor at the state medical examiners’ annual meeting.

“I went to my office over the weekend and destroyed all the promotional materials the company sent,” he said. “From now on in these kinds of cases, I will tell people to call their insurance companies.”

Others in the biohazard business told me this week they have reviewed even higher bills from Aftermath for insurance adjustors — including one for $82,800 last year in Muscatine.

Dale Cillian of BioPro, a Phoenix, Ariz., business owner who was an expert witness in a Texas lawsuit involving Aftermath, said the Muscatine case involving a body left unattended was the highest he’d ever reviewed.

“I told then our charges would have been $15,000 to $20,000, but closer to the lower (estimate),” he said.

Washington County Sheriff Jerry Dunbar, president of the Iowa State Sheriffs & Deputies Association, said he plans to discuss Aftermath next week at that association’s meeting.

Dunbar said that in the past he has told his own deputies to hand out the company’s cards, but he was unaware so many consumer complaints had been made to attorneys general, the Better Business Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission. He said he has since learned his department received a complaint about the company’s pricing.

Brauch also said his staff would explore posting online the names of reputable companies that do suicide and homicide cleanup to provide the resource for first-responders.

“Check around and always compare,” he warned. “If you get only one name, don’t rely on that.”

Greg Heath, a Waterloo landlord, and Amy Leonard, a West Des Moines administrative assistant, said they will be among those filing complaints with Brauch’s division.

In February, Heath said, a Waterloo police officer handed him the company’s card after a man committed suicide in one of his family’s apartments. He said he kicked workers out after an estimate on the biohazard cleanup shot from a low bid of $1,395 to $18,000.

He said Aftermath workers obtained signatures on new contracts from a tenant and occasional handyman in the building who had no authority to sign them, even though the company had his phone numbers.

He said he’s since learned two other families in the area have balked at high charges from the company.

“To me, it’s a legal liability problem for the city,” he said. “Why are police officers referring business to this company? These guys are predators.”

Leonard said she called and complained to Crawford County’s medical examiner after he referred her to Aftermath. The bill she received from the company was more than $80,000.

Leonard said her father passed away on his home in Denison, and Aftermath officials told her there would be extensive biohazard cleanup. The bill worked out to be about $10,000 a day — $17,000 of which she paid out-of-pocket because it was not covered by insurance.

Leonard said workers did do a good job of cleaning up her father’s extremely cluttered home, and they did have to do some structural work, but the costs were excessive, according to other experts.

“If you’ve never been through anything like that, you don’t know you should be calling people and getting different quotes.”

Anne Loomis, a Marion attorney, welcomed the inquiry into the company. She represented the executor of the estate of an elderly woman who died of a heart attack in her rural Marion home in 2009.

The company, Loomis said, tried to charge more than $50,000 for the cleanup and put a mechanic’s lien on the woman’s home. Loomis sued Aftermath attorney Patricia Blachinsky for filing a frivolous pleading and the insurance company eventually reached a settlement for $20,000, Loomis said.

McGowan, the Aftermath spokeswoman, defended the company by saying it would be “thrilled” if it didn’t have to follow OSHA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that guide how workers perform the difficult work. However, she said, the company follows federal rules because “the safety of employees as well as the customers is always the first thing we care about.”

McGowan said lots of companies “hang up a shingle” and say they specialize in biohazard clean-up.

“If everybody in the industry was held to the same standards we are, we would not be having this conversation,” she said.

She also said the company is not surprised insurance companies would contest covering certain expenses.

However, she said, the vast majority of individuals incur no more than their insurance deductible as costs. “And the vast majority of insurers we work with, we have great relationships with.”

The company’s promotional materials have offered competitors up to $750 for job referrals and other promotions.

But McGowan said last week Aftermath does not pay government workers who send biohazard work their way.

Aftermath Inc. Caught on Camera with staged crime scene..Owner still pleads they are a good company..LIAR!!!

I would like to think this blog and all who are taking steps to shut this company down are making a difference. Beware they are changing their name.

PLEASE VIEW THE VIDEO BY INSIDE EDITION>>HIDDEN CAMERA STING>>

http://www.insideedition.com/videos/1493-crime-scene-clean-up-inside-edition-investigates

Reader’s Watchdog: Grieving families shocked by cleanup company’s soaring costs

Here is yet another sad story about Aftermath, Inc

I have copy and pasted all that was on the link below for your convenience.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130414/NEWS03/304140050/Reader-s-Watchdog-Grieving-families-shocked-by-cleanup-company-s-soaring-costs?odyssey=tab&nclick_check=1

 

The past month has been painful enough for Cynthia Holtgrewe’s family. Last month, her teenage grandson took his own life by gunshot in Fort Dodge.

But that deep wound was made worse by an Illinois company that has been the subject of complaints to the Better Business Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission and attorneys general in at least a dozen states over staggeringly high prices and questionable business practices.

The company, Aftermath Inc., charged $44,000 for a day’s work at her daughter and son-in-law’s home.

Holtgrewe was further outraged after she learned Iowa law enforcement, county medical examiners and other first responders were referring families traumatized by suicides and homicides to Aftermath. And so the Bellevue, Neb., woman contacted the Des Moines Register Reader’s Watchdog to try to find out who was responsible.

“Somebody is getting money for referring customers to this company,” she alleged. “There should be some accountability for whoever pushed this company into their lives.”

Aftermath officials have steadfastly defended their pricing, and they did so again this week in the Fort Dodge case.

Company spokeswoman Laura McGowan said the price of biohazard cleanup depends on the size and scope of the work, but she contended the Fort Dodge family was involved at every step of the way.

“However, when you are dealing with something of this nature it is very intensive at a very emotional time,” McGowan said.

But my own search of court records and complaints to Iowa’s attorney general suggest Aftermath has had run-ins with numerous customers. And that was news that piqued the interest of law enforcement and the Iowa attorney general’s Consumer Protection Division.

“This is something we definitely want to look into,” said Bill Brauch, whose division has logged three complaints from Iowa families against Aftermath alleging unfair consumer practices since 2005.

Court records show Aftermath has obtained liens and judgments worth more than a half-million dollars against the homes and estates of Iowans who could not or would not pay for its services.

In Illinois, the attorney general’s office has mediated a dozen disputes over the past decade, most of them over the cost of services, according to spokesman Scott Mulford.

The company has been the subject of more serious lawsuits and investigations in Texas, Ohio and Massachusetts, after customers were stunned by charges of $20,000 to $40,000 to clean up biohazard scenes.

In a special investigation last month, news reporter Joce Sterman at WMAR in Baltimore tallied nearly two dozen complaints in Maryland and 11 other states.

Watch the TV report

Grief-stricken customers complain about high bills for crime scene cleanup

McGowan said people need to keep in mind the work is not simply cleaning.

In some cases, like in Fort Dodge, extensive steps must be taken to remove potentially infectious waste from homes.

In Fort Dodge, she said, workers had to remove pieces of a wall as they tried to clean up after the death.

“The challenge we faced was that the debris was scattered throughout the home because of how they removed the body,” she said.

But Rich Ross, president of the American Bio-Recovery Association, a national industry trade group, said he has been asked to compare Aftermath’s invoices on numerous occasions for insurance companies and has been an expert witness in court cases involving the company.

The company’s hourly rates are comparable to others in the industry, but he said workers inflate the time it takes so that the final bills are extraordinary.

“I wouldn’t hire them for anything,” Ross said. “I don’t know of any insurance company who has a good word to say about them.”

Estimate for work jumps to $44,000

Holtgrewe said her family’s nightmare with the company began shortly after her grandson, a high school student, committed suicide last month at home.

She said she did not want the boy’s name made public because the family is still traumatized from the event. (The Register traditionally doesn’t publish news stories involving suicides unless they occur in public places or the person involved is newsworthy, although in recent years we’ve written more about teen suicides in the state.)

Holtgrewe said she and the boy’s grandfather learned the news around noon on the day of the suicide and they drove to Iowa in one of the winter’s worst snowstorms.

She said the boy’s parents were given information about Aftermath and were told, “This is who you need to call.”

The company’s initial estimate of $17,000 to clean up the mess leaped to $44,000 after the first day, Holtgrewe said.

“We were at the funeral home the next morning when my husband pulled the company up on the Internet,” she said.

After reading of similar controversies around the country, the family and their insurance agent went to the house and kicked the Aftermath crew out.

The family, she said, wound up hiring ServePro of Fort Dodge to finish the job.

Afterward, the family claimed Aftermath workers took an antique Tiffany lamp, a jewelry box and the top off an antique dresser.

“They threw away clothes and things in other rooms, but anything electronic, they took,” she said.

McGowan said the reason for the high cost was that workers discovered biomaterial had permeated the walls.

She said the family authorized employees to complete the job, and they consented to the charges. She said company officials also inventoried items that had to be disposed of, and informed the family.

“At every point in time, we reviewed with the family when there was a change in material (used),” she said. “The family was empowered at every step.”

Marketing targets first responders

So who in Iowa recommended Aftermath Inc. and why?

I talked to Associate State Medical Examiner Michele Catellier, who consulted on the case. Webster County’s medical examiner on the scene was Dr. Dan Cole, she said.

I left messages for Cole four times, and he did not return my phone calls.

Catellier said the state recommends that counties tell families such services are available, but it does not recommend specific companies.

“We don’t even recommend providing a list,” she said.

Fort Dodge Assistant Police Chief Kevin Doty said Aftermath has sent cards to the department, which police use.

“If we have an incident that requires biohazard cleanup, we tell families this is a company that does it. But we don’t recommend any one company.”

Doty said he did not know if officers give out cards from similar companies.

Des Moines police give families a brochure when loved ones die. Aftermath is the first company listed among a half dozen companies that do cleanup work.

“Maybe we will have to reconsider that,” Sgt. Jason Halifax, a department spokesman, told me.

McGowen, Aftermath’s spokeswoman, said the company does market to first responders “like any other company would,” but it does not offer financial incentives for referrals.

Consumer oversight is nonexistent

Workers in the biohazard industry are subject to OSHA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules. But neither the state nor the federal government has established regulations that protect consumers in such situations.

Ross, the industry expert, said the national Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification is establishing industry standards.

Most biohazard companies don’t give estimates upfront because workers don’t know the scope of the job until they get started.

Ross said jobs can range from $3,000 to $15,000 because of their scope, but bills of $30,000 to $40,000 would be highly unusual.

“You could almost rebuild the parts of the house for that much,” he said.

Aftermath workers have claimed they need to be “out of their suits every 15 to 20 minutes and then rest between 20 to 40 minutes because of OSHA standards, and that’s not true,” he said.

Household items should not have disappeared in the Fort Dodge suicide, he said. “Hard stuff can be cleaned to a point where infection is not possible,” he said.

“This industry does have a few bad apples. But this one is the big boy on the block,” he said. “They are really good at marketing. They tell people they are there to care. And I tell you, it’s ridiculous.”

Lee Rood’s Reader’s Watchdog column helps Iowans get answers and accountability from public officials, the justice system, businesses and nonprofits. Contact her at lrood@dmreg.com or by calling 515-284-8549. Read past reports at DesMoinesRegister.com/ReadersWatchdog.

$32,571.75 ?????

The below content was taken from this web site

http://www1.whdh.com/features/articles/specialreport/BO146871/aftermath/

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Special Report: Aftermath

Posted: 11/09/11

111109_aftermath.jpg

A family’s pain is in plain view. Regine Revelus crumbles after learning her 23-year-old son has murdered two of his younger sisters before being killed by police in their Milton home.

“Some days I can barely get out of bed because of my kids. I miss them dearly,” said mother Regina Revelus.

Now, more than two years later, Regine is not only battling her nightmares, she’s had to battle the company her family hired to help them, a crime scene clean-up company called Aftermath, Inc.

“Dealing with my kids and the cleaning company at the same time, that’s too much, that was too much,” said Revelus.

Revelus says the bill was too much.

“$32,571.75,” she said.

How she felt when she saw that number:

“I was shocked.”

Shocked because the contract her daughter signed with the Illinois-based company didn’t provide a total cost estimate, only hourly rates. And Revelus was in such agony she didn’t think to call her insurance company to see what costs they would cover.

But it was too late. Revelus says before her insurance claim was even processed, Aftermath, Inc. had already put a lien on her Milton home.

“If they put a lien on your house, that’s mean,” said Revelus.

She isn’t alone. Aftermath, Inc. has moved to place liens on 41 properties in this state since 2006.

Five lawsuits have been filed against the company in Massachusetts.

One person suing is the brother of William Spada, the Dedham man who shot and killed his wife and injured his daughter before killing himself in their home last winter.

According to the court filing, Aftermath, Inc. billed more than $30,000 for a clean-up job the plaintiff claims is valued at no more than about $16,000 and began the process of placing a lien on the home.

The lawsuit claims Aftermath, Inc. “deceived” the Spada family because the company never provided a total estimate of the “reasonably expected cost.”

“There’s a one-sidedness here, a vulnerable consumer, a company that has a pattern of operating where practices may be unfair,” said Barbara Anthony, Undersecretary of the Mass. Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation.

“It was a nightmare, definitely a nightmare, and it lasted over a year,” said daughter Pamela Vallon-Jackson.

Aftermath, Inc. put a lien on Pamela’s mother’s home in Brewster after her mom died.

Pamela says the family hired the company and was stunned to get a bill for a three person crew, bio-hazard containers, and supplies totaling close to $12,000.

“I was in such a state of grief. The gentleman who was here from Aftermath said he’d never seen a case where insurance didn’t cover the cost,” said Vallon-Jackson.

Most homeowner’s insurance will cover some of the crime scene clean-up costs, but insurance industry experts say when they get a bill they won’t just write a check.

“We’ll take a look at what we paid in the past, we’ll take a look at what a market is for that type of service, making sure policy holders aren’t being taken advantage of,” said Frank O’Brien, Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

We contacted Aftermath, Inc. about the allegations. They told us in a statement:

“We cannot comment on any specifics of this matter due to pending litigation. However, Aftermath strives to provide the best and most compassionate services to our customers while also protecting the safety of our employees. It is truly unfortunate that the real story of who is victimizing families is being twisted.”

Pamela and Regine worked out settlements with Aftermath, Inc., but say they still paid more than they ever imagined.

“I just couldn’t believe it was happening to us on top of the shock and devastation of my mom’s death. It was just horrible,” said Vallon-Jackson.

“When people are in a bad situation, they take advantage of the situation to make money,” said Revelus.

COMMENTS

Gary Karle

The same scenarios are playing out here in Texas. The Fox affiliate in the Dallas/Fort Worth area did a story on Aftermath, but the video is no longer available due to some sort of legal wrangling that Aftermath did. I suggest anyone who sees this video download and save it if you are filing against Aftermath. The slimeballs will find a way to get this story pulled.

  • Cyndi Wyrick-Glass

    I also worked for this company and I can tell you that they are just as shady as everyone claims.  I left because of inappropriate behavior and comments that were being made to me based on my appearance but I worked in collections.  I KNOW what they are doing.

  • I worked for this company. I can tell you this is very common. They only care about the bottom line, and they will do everything they can to take you for everything they have. As a supervisor I was commonly asked how much money I thought the customer had so they would know how much they thought they could get out of them. They also commit insurance fraud by “taking care of the deductible”. Which means they overcharge the bill. Do yourself a favor and look into any company you do business with. Companies like Aftermath prey on your emotions, and look for any opportunity to take everything you have.

Read more: http://www1.whdh.com/features/articles/specialreport/BO146871/aftermath/#ixzz1vGuWJhwU

Thank you and sorry!

I just want to thank all of you who have made an effort to post your experiences on this site about the business ethics of Aftermath, Inc. And I also wanted to say sorry for what they have done to you and many others. Please feel free to post your experience here with us.

Just like the old saying goes. “You can out run the police cars, but you cannot out run the radios.”  With that said, Aftermath might be able to stay under the radar, but once the internet voice is heard they can be stopped or at least slowed down.

I have a feeling this will not be the last

Lawsuit filed over crime-scene thefts
By Eric Heisig
Staff Writer
Published: Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 6:38 p.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 6:38 p.m.
Page 1 of 2
A Houma business owner shot by her husband, who later killed himself, is suing a man convicted of stealing more than $53,000 worth of items from her home when he was cleaning up blood left behind.
Nicole Blanchard, 31, was at University Hospital in New Orleans for several months in early 2011, recovering and undergoing reconstructive surgery after 57-year-old Larry Blanchard shot her in their bedroom on 102 Woodburn Drive, authorities said. After shooting his wife, police said Larry Blanchard killed himself.
Reports of marital discord between the two had surfaced shorty before the shooting, though no complaints were made to law enforcement, police said at the time.
In December, Blanchard, who remains the owner of several Body Elite gyms in Houma, filed a lawsuit against Benjamin Hornbeck, who was working as part of the Texas crime-scene cleanup company Aftermath. A detective’s report from the Terrebonne Sheriff’s Office said Hornbeck, of Cedar Hill, Texas, stole two bass guitars, a CD containing photographs, a watch and several valuable pieces of jewelry, among other items.
As Aftermath was cleaning Blanchard’s house, her family noticed several pieces of jewelry missing from the couple’s bedroom, the report says.
When questioned, Hornbeck, 30, admitted to stealing the bass guitars, saying he intended to keep them because he plays. However, Hornbeck did not admit to detectives that he stole the jewelry, but a jewelry box was later found in Aftermath’s van and in Burger King bags, the report says.
In April, Hornbeck pleaded guilty to one count theft over $500 and was given a three-year suspended sentence, according to court records.
Aftermath has not been named in the lawsuit because the company’s name was unknown when the suit was filed, said Damon Baldone, Blanchard’s attorney. However, the police report names the company as Hornbeck’s employer. An unknown insurance company also is named as a defendant.
The lawsuit was filed because restitution for the stolen items was not part of Hornbeck’s plea agreement. Several pieces of jewelry, including a 5-karat gold ring with six diamonds, worth more than $26,000, were not recovered, the police report says.
The lawsuit says Blanchard is seeking money for breaching a contract, as well as for mental anguish and suffering. She also is seeking damages “due to the loss of articles that had great sentimental value, and that represented a happier life now lost, and has resulted in mental pain and suffering,” the suit says
Baldone said the suit is in its early stages, and that Hornbeck, to his knowledge, has not been served with a copy.
Todd Joffrion, Hornbeck’s attorney for the criminal charges, said he was not aware of the civil case and has not been hired to represent him.
Hornbeck could not be reached for comment Thursday afternoon.
In a statement, Aftermath said it was unaware of any lawsuit against the company.
“We are incredibly disheartened about the situation,” the statement says. “Aftermath has a zero tolerance policy against any misconduct of this kind. Upon first learning of the incident, Aftermath took immediate disciplinary action regarding the individual involved, who is no longer with the company. We immediately contacted the family to provide any assistance that we could and also fully cooperated with the authorities.”
The company says its workers are “trained in appropriately working with families to restore their home after a traumatic event, and we make every attempt to ease the burden of an already difficult situation.”
Full criminal background checks are performed on all prospective employees, the statement says.
Staff Writer Eric Heisig can be reached at 857-2202 or eric.heisig@houmatoday.com. Follow him on Twitter @TerrebonneCrime.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.